Re: [PATCH 35/43] xfs: enable fsmap reporting for internal RT devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 15, 2024 at 07:26:13AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 03:11:15PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > +		/* Fabricate an rmap entry for space occupied by the data dev */
> > > +		error = xfs_getfsmap_helper(tp, info, &frec);
> > > +		if (error)
> > > +			return error;
> > 
> > Seeing as you report different fmr_device values for the data and rt
> > devices, I'd have though that you'd want the rt fsmappings to start at
> > fmr_physical == 0.  But then I guess for the sb_rtstart > 0 case, the
> > rtblock values that get written into the bmbt have that rtstart value
> > added in, don't they?
> 
> The bmbt values are all relative to rtstart, the daddr translation is what
> adds the offset.  So if we want to take the offset out of the fsmap
> reporting, I'll need new helpers to not add it or manually subtract it
> afterwards.  If that's preferred it should be doable, even if the fsmap
> code keeps confusing me more each time I look at it.

I think it's ok if you can leave it as it is.  Once you move to
"virtual" fmr_device numbers (aka not a dev_t) then it's up to you to
define how the fmr_physical address space works.  It's no longer a
reference to a block device that you can open/pread/etc.

--D




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux