Re: [PATCH 10/43] xfs: preserve RT reservations across remounts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 09:54:35AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> From: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@xxxxxxx>
> 
> Introduce a reservation setting for rt devices so that zoned GC
> reservations are preserved over remount ro/rw cycles.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans Holmberg <hans.holmberg@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
>  fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h |  3 ++-
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c |  2 +-
>  3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> index 4174035b2ac9..db910ecc1ed4 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
> @@ -465,10 +465,15 @@ xfs_mount_reset_sbqflags(
>  }
>  
>  uint64_t
> -xfs_default_resblks(xfs_mount_t *mp)
> +xfs_default_resblks(
> +	struct xfs_mount	*mp,
> +	enum xfs_free_counter	ctr)
>  {
>  	uint64_t resblks;
>  
> +	if (ctr == XC_FREE_RTEXTENTS)
> +		return 0;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * We default to 5% or 8192 fsbs of space reserved, whichever is
>  	 * smaller.  This is intended to cover concurrent allocation
> @@ -683,6 +688,7 @@ xfs_mountfs(
>  	uint			quotamount = 0;
>  	uint			quotaflags = 0;
>  	int			error = 0;
> +	int			i;
>  
>  	xfs_sb_mount_common(mp, sbp);
>  
> @@ -1051,18 +1057,20 @@ xfs_mountfs(
>  	 * privileged transactions. This is needed so that transaction
>  	 * space required for critical operations can dip into this pool
>  	 * when at ENOSPC. This is needed for operations like create with
> -	 * attr, unwritten extent conversion at ENOSPC, etc. Data allocations
> -	 * are not allowed to use this reserved space.
> +	 * attr, unwritten extent conversion at ENOSPC, garbage collection
> +	 * etc. Data allocations are not allowed to use this reserved space.
>  	 *
>  	 * This may drive us straight to ENOSPC on mount, but that implies
>  	 * we were already there on the last unmount. Warn if this occurs.
>  	 */
>  	if (!xfs_is_readonly(mp)) {
> -		error = xfs_reserve_blocks(mp, XC_FREE_BLOCKS,
> -				xfs_default_resblks(mp));
> -		if (error)
> -			xfs_warn(mp,
> +		for (i = 0; i < XC_FREE_NR; i++) {
> +			error = xfs_reserve_blocks(mp, i,
> +					xfs_default_resblks(mp, i));
> +			if (error)
> +				xfs_warn(mp,
>  	"Unable to allocate reserve blocks. Continuing without reserve pool.");

Should we be able to log *which* reserve block pool is out?

Otherwise looks good to me.

--D

> +		}
>  
>  		/* Reserve AG blocks for future btree expansion. */
>  		error = xfs_fs_reserve_ag_blocks(mp);
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> index d92bce7bc184..73bc053fdd17 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
> @@ -640,7 +640,8 @@ xfs_daddr_to_agbno(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_daddr_t d)
>  }
>  
>  extern void	xfs_uuid_table_free(void);
> -extern uint64_t xfs_default_resblks(xfs_mount_t *mp);
> +uint64_t	xfs_default_resblks(struct xfs_mount *mp,
> +			enum xfs_free_counter ctr);
>  extern int	xfs_mountfs(xfs_mount_t *mp);
>  extern void	xfs_unmountfs(xfs_mount_t *);
>  
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> index 1960ee0aad45..f57c27940467 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_super.c
> @@ -944,7 +944,7 @@ xfs_restore_resvblks(
>  			resblks = mp->m_resblks[i].save;
>  			mp->m_resblks[i].save = 0;
>  		} else
> -			resblks = xfs_default_resblks(mp);
> +			resblks = xfs_default_resblks(mp, i);
>  		xfs_reserve_blocks(mp, i, resblks);
>  	}
>  }
> -- 
> 2.45.2
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux