Re: [PATCH 16/21] xfs: don't lose solo superblock counter update transactions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 05:28:53PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Superblock counter updates are tracked via per-transaction counters in
> the xfs_trans object.  These changes are then turned into dirty log
> items in xfs_trans_apply_sb_deltas just prior to commiting the log items
> to the CIL.
> 
> However, updating the per-transaction counter deltas do not cause
> XFS_TRANS_DIRTY to be set on the transaction.  In other words, a pure sb
> counter update will be silently discarded if there are no other dirty
> log items attached to the transaction.
> 
> This is currently not the case anywhere in the filesystem because sb
> counter updates always dirty at least one other metadata item, but let's
> not leave a logic bomb.

xfs_trans_mod_sb is the only place that sets XFS_TRANS_SB_DIRTY, and
always forces XFS_TRANS_DIRTY.  So this seems kinda intentional, even
if this new version is much cleaner.  So the change looks fine:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

But I don't think the Fixes tag is really warranted.





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux