Re: [PATCH 01/12] generic/757: fix various bugs in this test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 03:01:38PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Fix this test so the check doesn't fail on XFS, and restrict runtime to
> 100 loops because otherwise this test takes many hours.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/generic/757 |    7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tests/generic/757 b/tests/generic/757
> index 0ff5a8ac00182b..9d41975bde07bb 100755
> --- a/tests/generic/757
> +++ b/tests/generic/757
> @@ -63,9 +63,14 @@ prev=$(_log_writes_mark_to_entry_number mkfs)
>  cur=$(_log_writes_find_next_fua $prev)
>  [ -z "$cur" ] && _fail "failed to locate next FUA write"
>  
> -while [ ! -z "$cur" ]; do
> +for ((i = 0; i < 100; i++)); do
>  	_log_writes_replay_log_range $cur $SCRATCH_DEV >> $seqres.full
>  
> +	# xfs_repair won't run if the log is dirty
> +	if [ $FSTYP = "xfs" ]; then
> +		_scratch_mount
> +		_scratch_unmount
> +	fi

Hi Darrick,

I didn't merge this patch last week, due to we were still talking
about the "discards" things:

https://lore.kernel.org/fstests/20241115182821.s3pt4wmkueyjggx3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u

Do you think we need to do a force discards at here, or change the
SCRATCH_DEV to dmthin to support discards?

Thanks,
Zorro

>  	_check_scratch_fs
>  
>  	prev=$cur
> 





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux