Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] iomap: fix zero padding data issue in concurrent append writes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 09:26:45AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> IOW following the train of thought in the other subthread, would any
> practical workload be affected if we just trimmed io_size when needed by
> i_size and left it at that?

Can you explain what you mean with that? 





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux