Re: [PATCH] xfs/157: mkfs does not need a specific fssize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 07:02:26AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 05, 2024 at 05:58:03PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > When the two conflict, _scratch_mkfs drops the global MKFS_OPTIONS
> > and uses only the local parameters so the filesystem is set up with
> > the configuration the test expects.
> > 
> > In this case, MKFS_OPTIONS="-m rmapbt=1" which conflicts with the
> > local RTDEV/USE_EXTERNAL test setup. Because the test icurrently
> > overloads the global MKFS_OPTIONS with local test options, the local
> > test parameters are dropped along with the global paramters when
> > there is a conflict. Hence the mkfs_scratch call fails to set the
> > filesystem up the way the test expects.
> 
> But the rmapbt can be default on, in which case it does not get
> removed.  And then without the _sized we'll run into the problem that
> Hans' patches fixed once again.

Well we /could/ make _scratch_mkfs_sized pass options through to the
underlying _scratch_mkfs.

--D




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux