Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] xfs: online grow vs. log recovery stress test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 01:21:34PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> fstests includes decent functional tests for online growfs and
> shrink, and decent stress tests for crash and log recovery, but no
> combination of the two. This test combines bits from a typical
> growfs stress test like xfs/104 with crash recovery cycles from a
> test like generic/388. As a result, this reproduces at least a
> couple recently fixed issues related to log recovery of online
> growfs operations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/xfs/609     | 81 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tests/xfs/609.out |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100755 tests/xfs/609
>  create mode 100644 tests/xfs/609.out
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/609 b/tests/xfs/609
> new file mode 100755
> index 00000000..4df966f7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/609
> @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
> +#! /bin/bash
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +# Copyright (c) 2024 Red Hat, Inc.  All Rights Reserved.
> +#
> +# FS QA Test No. 609
> +#
> +# Test XFS online growfs log recovery.
> +#
> +. ./common/preamble
> +_begin_fstest auto growfs stress shutdown log recoveryloop
> +
> +# Import common functions.
> +. ./common/filter
> +
> +_stress_scratch()
> +{
> +	procs=4
> +	nops=999999
> +	# -w ensures that the only ops are ones which cause write I/O
> +	FSSTRESS_ARGS=`_scale_fsstress_args -d $SCRATCH_MNT -w -p $procs \
> +	    -n $nops $FSSTRESS_AVOID`
> +	$FSSTRESS_PROG $FSSTRESS_ARGS >> $seqres.full 2>&1 &
> +}
> +
> +_require_scratch
> +_require_command "$XFS_GROWFS_PROG" xfs_growfs
> +_require_command "$KILLALL_PROG" killall
> +
> +_cleanup()
> +{
> +	$KILLALL_ALL fsstress > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	wait
> +	cd /
> +	rm -f $tmp.*
> +}
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs | _filter_mkfs >$seqres.full 2>$tmp.mkfs
> +. $tmp.mkfs	# extract blocksize and data size for scratch device
> +
> +endsize=`expr 550 \* 1048576`	# stop after growing this big
> +[ `expr $endsize / $dbsize` -lt $dblocks ] || _notrun "Scratch device too small"
> +
> +nags=4
> +size=`expr 125 \* 1048576`	# 120 megabytes initially
> +sizeb=`expr $size / $dbsize`	# in data blocks
> +logblks=$(_scratch_find_xfs_min_logblocks -dsize=${size} -dagcount=${nags})
> +
> +_scratch_mkfs_xfs -lsize=${logblks}b -dsize=${size} -dagcount=${nags} \
> +	>> $seqres.full || _fail "mkfs failed"


This test fails on my testing machine, as [1], due to above mkfs.xfs print
a warning:

"mkfs.xfs: small data volume, ignoring data volume stripe unit 128 and stripe width 256"

My test device is scripted, if without the specific mkfs options, it got:
  # mkfs.xfs -f $SCRATCH_DEV
  meta-data=/dev/sda6              isize=512    agcount=25, agsize=1064176 blks
           =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
           =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=1
           =                       reflink=1    bigtime=1 inobtcount=1 nrext64=1
           =                       exchange=0  
  data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=26604400, imaxpct=25
           =                       sunit=16     swidth=32 blks
  naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0, ftype=1, parent=0
  log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=179552, version=2
           =                       sectsz=512   sunit=16 blks, lazy-count=1
  realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

But if with the specific mkfs options, it got:

  # /usr/sbin/mkfs.xfs  -f   -lsize=3075b -dsize=131072000 -dagcount=4 $SCRATCH_DEV
  mkfs.xfs: small data volume, ignoring data volume stripe unit 128 and stripe width 256
  meta-data=/dev/sda6              isize=512    agcount=4, agsize=8000 blks
           =                       sectsz=512   attr=2, projid32bit=1
           =                       crc=1        finobt=1, sparse=1, rmapbt=1
           =                       reflink=1    bigtime=1 inobtcount=1 nrext64=1
           =                       exchange=0  
  data     =                       bsize=4096   blocks=32000, imaxpct=25
           =                       sunit=0      swidth=0 blks
  naming   =version 2              bsize=4096   ascii-ci=0, ftype=1, parent=0
  log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=3075, version=2
           =                       sectsz=512   sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
  realtime =none                   extsz=4096   blocks=0, rtextents=0

Hi Brian, if you think "ignoreing volume stripe" doesn't affect the test, we can
filter out the stderr with "2>&1". I can help to change that when I merge.

Others looks good to me, with above confirmation:

Reviewed-by: Zorro Lang <zlang@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Zorro

[1]
SECTION       -- default
FSTYP         -- xfs (non-debug)
PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 dell-per750-41 6.11.0-0.rc6.49.fc42.x86_64+debug #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Sep  2 02:18:15 UTC 2024
MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f /dev/sda6
MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:root_t:s0 /dev/sda6 /mnt/scratch

xfs/609       [failed, exit status 1]_check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see /root/git/xfstests/results//default/xfs/609.dmesg)
- output mismatch (see /root/git/xfstests/results//default/xfs/609.out.bad)
    --- tests/xfs/609.out       2024-10-30 16:29:52.250176790 +0800
    +++ /root/git/xfstests/results//default/xfs/609.out.bad     2024-10-30 16:31:01.759590117 +0800
    @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
     QA output created by 609
    -Silence is golden.
    +mkfs.xfs: small data volume, ignoring data volume stripe unit 128 and stripe width 256
    ...
    (Run 'diff -u /root/git/xfstests/tests/xfs/609.out /root/git/xfstests/results//default/xfs/609.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
xfs/610       [not run] External volumes not in use, skipped this test
Ran: xfs/609 xfs/610
Not run: xfs/610
Failures: xfs/609
Failed 1 of 2 tests


> +_scratch_mount
> +
> +# Grow the filesystem in random sized chunks while stressing and performing
> +# shutdown and recovery. The randomization is intended to create a mix of sub-ag
> +# and multi-ag grows.
> +while [ $size -le $endsize ]; do
> +	echo "*** stressing a ${sizeb} block filesystem" >> $seqres.full
> +	_stress_scratch
> +	incsize=$((RANDOM % 40 * 1048576))
> +	size=`expr $size + $incsize`
> +	sizeb=`expr $size / $dbsize`	# in data blocks
> +	echo "*** growing to a ${sizeb} block filesystem" >> $seqres.full
> +	$XFS_GROWFS_PROG -D ${sizeb} $SCRATCH_MNT >> $seqres.full
> +
> +	sleep $((RANDOM % 3))
> +	_scratch_shutdown
> +	ps -e | grep fsstress > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	while [ $? -eq 0 ]; do
> +		$KILLALL_PROG -9 fsstress > /dev/null 2>&1
> +		wait > /dev/null 2>&1
> +		ps -e | grep fsstress > /dev/null 2>&1
> +	done
> +	_scratch_cycle_mount || _fail "cycle mount failed"
> +done > /dev/null 2>&1
> +wait	# stop for any remaining stress processes
> +
> +_scratch_unmount
> +
> +echo Silence is golden.
> +
> +status=0
> +exit
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/609.out b/tests/xfs/609.out
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000..8be27d3a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tests/xfs/609.out
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +QA output created by 609
> +Silence is golden.
> -- 
> 2.46.2
> 
> 





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux