[PATCH 6.6 026/124] xfs: remove a racy if_bytes check in xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



6.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

commit 86de848403abda05bf9c16dcdb6bef65a8d88c41 upstream.

Accessing if_bytes without the ilock is racy.  Remove the initial
if_bytes == 0 check in xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent and let
ext_iext_lookup_extent fail for this case after we've taken the ilock.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Chandan Babu R <chandanbabu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Catherine Hoang <catherine.hoang@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c |    6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
@@ -716,12 +716,6 @@ xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent(
 	int			nmaps;
 	int			error;
 
-	/* No COW extents?  That's easy! */
-	if (ifp->if_bytes == 0) {
-		*offset_fsb = end_fsb;
-		return 0;
-	}
-
 	resblks = XFS_EXTENTADD_SPACE_RES(mp, XFS_DATA_FORK);
 	error = xfs_trans_alloc(mp, &M_RES(mp)->tr_write, resblks, 0,
 			XFS_TRANS_RESERVE, &tp);






[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux