Re: [PATCH v3] xfs: Check for delayed allocations before setting extsize

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 09:40:57AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 09:38:30AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2024 at 08:24:27PM +0530, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> > > Extsize is allowed to be set on files with no data in it. For this,
> > > we were checking if the files have extents but missed to check if
> > > delayed extents were present. This patch adds that check.
> > > 
> > > While we are at it, also refactor this check into a helper since
> > > its used in some other places as well like xfs_inactive() or
> > > xfs_ioctl_setattr_xflags()
> > > 
> > > **Without the patch (SUCCEEDS)**
> > > 
> > > $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
> > > 
> > > wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> > > 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
> > > 
> > > **With the patch (FAILS as expected)**
> > > 
> > > $ xfs_io -c 'open -f testfile' -c 'pwrite 0 1024' -c 'extsize 65536'
> > > 
> > > wrote 1024/1024 bytes at offset 0
> > > 1 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0002 sec (4.628 MiB/sec and 4739.3365 ops/sec)
> > > xfs_io: FS_IOC_FSSETXATTR testfile: Invalid argument
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Looks good now,
> > Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> That said, could you add a fixes tag for the xfs_ioctl_setattr_*
> changes, please?

Hi Darrick,

Sure I'll send a new version. Thanks for the review!

Regards,
ojaswin




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux