On Wed, 2024-10-02 at 11:14 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > On Tue 01-10-24 09:34:18, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 15:20 +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > > diff --git a/fs/stat.c b/fs/stat.c > > > > index 41e598376d7e..381926fb405f 100644 > > > > --- a/fs/stat.c > > > > +++ b/fs/stat.c > > > > @@ -26,6 +26,35 @@ > > > > #include "internal.h" > > > > #include "mount.h" > > > > > > > > +/** > > > > + * fill_mg_cmtime - Fill in the mtime and ctime and flag ctime as QUERIED > > > > + * @stat: where to store the resulting values > > > > + * @request_mask: STATX_* values requested > > > > + * @inode: inode from which to grab the c/mtime > > > > + * > > > > + * Given @inode, grab the ctime and mtime out if it and store the result > > > ^^ of > > > > > > > + * in @stat. When fetching the value, flag it as QUERIED (if not already) > > > > + * so the next write will record a distinct timestamp. > > > > + */ > > > > +void fill_mg_cmtime(struct kstat *stat, u32 request_mask, struct inode *inode) > > > > +{ > > > > > > Given how things worked out in the end, it seems this function doesn't need > > > to handle mtime at all and we can move mtime handling back to shared generic > > > code? > > > > > > > I don't think we can. The mtime is effectively derived from the ctime. > > > > If I query only the mtime, I think it's reasonable to expect that it > > will change if there is another write, even if I don't query the ctime. > > We won't get that unless we can also set the flag in the ctime when > > only the mtime is requested. > > Aha, right. I already forgot about this :). Can you please add to the > comment the above explanation so that we remember next time somebody wants > to "clean this up" like me ;)? Thanks! > > Also feel free to add: > > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > > Honza Done, and the revised version is in my tree. Thanks for the review! -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>