Re: [linux-next:master] [xfs] 3062a738d7: filebench.sum_operations/s -85.0% regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2024-10-01 at 17:09 +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:21:30PM GMT, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > This is a known problem.
> > 
> > I have a fix that moves the floor handing into the timekeeper, but
> > Thomas said he had a better way to do this, so I haven't resent them
> > yet.
> > 
> > The patches in Christian's tree are out of date, so it may be best to
> > just drop them for now until I have the newer set ready.
> 
> Yeah, I only kept including them while the merge window wasn't closed so
> not to cause unnecessary churn pre merge window (Since we only got the
> performance regression report at -rc7...).

Understood.

After I wrote this, Thomas replied and said that he couldn't suggest
any way to improve on what I'm already doing in this series. I re-
posted the set a few hours ago, so it might be good to replace that
series in your tree with those.

Hopefully the timekeeping devs will send some Acked-by's or R-b's soon
(hint, hint)!
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux