On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:55:56AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > And I guess the extra xfs_perag_rele is ok because xfs_initialize_perag > sets it to 1 and the _unused free function didn't care what the active > refcount was? Yes.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2024 at 11:55:56AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > And I guess the extra xfs_perag_rele is ok because xfs_initialize_perag > sets it to 1 and the _unused free function didn't care what the active > refcount was? Yes.