On Thu, Sep 12, 2024 at 09:20:51AM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > Signed-off-by: Bastian Germann <bage@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > debian/control | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control > index 369d11a4..c3c6b263 100644 > --- a/debian/control > +++ b/debian/control > @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Section: admin > Priority: optional > Maintainer: XFS Development Team <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Uploaders: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anibal Monsalve Salazar <anibal@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bastian Germann <bage@xxxxxxxxxx> > -Build-Depends: libinih-dev (>= 53), uuid-dev, debhelper (>= 12), gettext, libtool, libedit-dev, libblkid-dev (>= 2.17), linux-libc-dev, libdevmapper-dev, libattr1-dev, libicu-dev, pkg-config, liburcu-dev > +Build-Depends: libinih-dev (>= 53), uuid-dev, debhelper (>= 12), gettext, libtool, libedit-dev, libblkid-dev (>= 2.17), linux-libc-dev, libdevmapper-dev, libattr1-dev, libicu-dev, pkg-config, liburcu-dev, systemd-dev /me notices that on a bookworm system, systemd-dev only exists in bookworm-backports as version 254.16. This is newer than the systemd 252.30 package, which causes a fair amount of mayhem here. Is there a compelling reason to upgrade systemd on a stable debian system? I don't mind patching this back out for my own purposes, but thought I'd make a note of this publicly. --D > Standards-Version: 4.0.0 > Homepage: https://xfs.wiki.kernel.org/ > > -- > 2.45.2 > >
