Re: [PATCH 3/6] fs: sort out the fallocate mode vs flag mess

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 08:43:14AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote:
> > -	if ((mode & ~FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE) && IS_APPEND(inode))
> > +	if (mode != FALLOC_FL_ALLOCATE_RANGE && IS_APPEND(inode))
> >  		return -EPERM;
> 
> Unless I'm misreading, this changes semantics by enforcing that we
> cannot use KEEP_SIZE on append only files. That means one can no longer
> do a post-eof prealloc without actually changing the file size, which on
> a quick test seems to work today.

No, I think it was me misreading the old code.  And I'm a little worried
that no test cought it.





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux