On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 09:19:03PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 07:47:51AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 03:56:53PM +0800, Ma Xinjian wrote:
> > > This test requires a kernel patch since 3bf963a6c6 ("xfs/348: partially revert
> > > dbcc549317"), so note that in the test.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Ma Xinjian <maxj.fnst@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > tests/xfs/348 | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/xfs/348 b/tests/xfs/348
> > > index 3502605c..e4bc1328 100755
> > > --- a/tests/xfs/348
> > > +++ b/tests/xfs/348
> > > @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
> > > . ./common/preamble
> > > _begin_fstest auto quick fuzzers repair
> > >
> > > +_fixed_by_git_commit kernel 38de567906d95 \
> > > + "xfs: allow symlinks with short remote targets"
> >
> > Considering that 38de567906d95 is itself a fix for 1eb70f54c445f, do we
> > want a _broken_by_git_commit to warn people not to apply 1eb70 without
> > also applying 38de5?
>
> We already have _wants_xxxx_commit and _fixed_by_xxxx_commit, for now, I
> don't think we need a new one. Maybe:
>
> _fixed_by_kernel_commit 38de567906d95 ..............
> _wants_kernel_commit 1eb70f54c445f .............
>
> make sense? And use some comments to explain why 1eb70 is wanted?
Oh! I didn't realize we had _wants_kernel_commit. Yeah, that's fine.
--D
> Thanks,
> Zorro
>
> >
> > --D
> >
> > > +
> > > # Import common functions.
> > > . ./common/filter
> > > . ./common/repair
> > > --
> > > 2.42.0
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
