On Mon, Jul 08, 2024 at 03:48:20PM +0100, John Garry wrote: >>> + int isforcealign; /* freeing for inode with forcealign */ >> >> This is really a bool. And while it matches the code around it the >> code feels a bit too verbose.. > > I can change both to a bool - would that be better? > > Using isfa (instead of isforcealign) might be interpreted as something else The check should be used in one single place where we decided if we need to to the alignment based adjustments. So IMHO just killing it and open coding it there seems way easier. Yes, it is in a loop, but compared to all the work done is is really cheap. >> We've been long wanting to split the whole align / convert unwritten / >> etc code into a helper outside the main bumapi flow. And when adding >> new logic to it this might indeed be a good time. > > ok, I'll see if can come up with something I can take a look too. There is some real mess in there like trying to account for cases where the transaction doesn't have a block reservation, which I think could have happen in truncate until Zhang Yi fixed it for the 6.11 merge window.
