On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 08:39:51AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > +/* > > + * Don't bother propagating errors. We're just doing cleanup, and the caller > > + * ignores the return value anyway. > > Shouldn't we drop the int return from the function declaration, then? > > (Is that also a cleanup that's you're working on?) We can't drop it without changing the f_ops->release signature and updates to the many instance of it. That would still be worthwhile project, but it's something for someone who is better at scripting than me.
