On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 04:09:18PM -0500, Bill O'Donnell wrote:
> Use time_t instead of int for interval field.
>
> Coverity-id: 1596599
>
> Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hopefully the intervals never get that big, but yes, we could use a time
interval type instead of the ever popular int.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
--D
> ---
> repair/progress.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/repair/progress.c b/repair/progress.c
> index 2ce36cef..15455a99 100644
> --- a/repair/progress.c
> +++ b/repair/progress.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ typedef struct msg_block_s {
> uint64_t *done;
> uint64_t *total;
> int count;
> - int interval;
> + time_t interval;
> } msg_block_t;
> static msg_block_t global_msgs;
>
> --
> 2.45.2
>
>
