Re: [Lsf-pc] XFS BoF at LSFMM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 07:48:16AM -0600, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, May 09, 2024 at 10:47:45AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > Ritesh and Ted and Jan and I were chatting during the ext4 concall just
> > > > now.  Could we have a 30 minute iomap bof at 2:30pm followed by the XFS
> > > > bof after that?  That would give us some time to chat with hch about
> > > > iomap (and xfs) direction before he has to leave.
> > > >
> > > > Alternately, we could announce a lunchtime discussion group on Monday
> > > > following Ritesh's presentation about iomap.  That could fit everyone's
> > > > schedule better?  Also everyone's braincaches will likely be warmer.
> > > 
> > > Seems to me that there will be a wider interest in iomap BoF
> > > Not sure what you mean by lunchtime discussion.
> > 
> > Monday 90-minute lunch is posted as being in "Grand ballroom C", so I
> > would tell everyone to come find the table(s) I'm sitting at for a
> > discussion over lunch.  We can move out to a hallway after everyone's
> > done eating.
> > 
> > > We can move Willy's GFP_NOFS talk to 15:30 and have the iomap BoF
> > > after Ritesh's session.
> > 
> > <shrug> If you like, though I don't think it's totally necessary.  But
> > you might have a better idea of what the venue is like than I do, so
> > I'll let you make that call. :)
> 
> How did we decide to resolve this?  If we have the iomap BOF at
> 2:30pm, with a hard stop at 3:00pm, that would work for everyone
> including Cristoph.
> 
> Or we can try to get all of the people interested in talking about
> iomap at lunch on Wednesday.

It's currently scheduled for 12:30 (Mountain Time, or GMT -0600) tomorrow the
14th.  Schedule still subject to change tho

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/176LXLys9Uh6A-Eal2flrzcbUSJMUXGkGwyihr9jAAaQ/edit#gid=0

--D

> Or we could do something that requires a lot more juggling of slots,
> which I'll leave to the track leads.  :-)
> 
> All of these ideas work for me.
> 
> 
> As far as scheduling per-file system BOF's, I'd like to claim the slot
> immediately after XFS for an ext4 BOF, it that would be OK.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 						- Ted




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux