On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 03:39:27 PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 11:55:26PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:24:22PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > In the next few patches we're going to refactor the attr remote code so >> > that we can support headerless remote xattr values for storing merkle >> > tree blocks. For now, let's change the code to use unsigned int to >> > describe quantities of bytes and blocks that cannot be negative. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > Reviewed-by: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@xxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Looks good: >> >> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Thanks! > >> Can we please get this included ASAP instead of having it linger around? > > Chandan, how many more patches are you willing to take for 6.10? I > think Christoph has a bunch of fully-reviewed cleanups lurking on the > list, and then there's this one. I have pushed a set of new patches to for-next a few hours ago. Also, I have queued the following patchsets for internal testing, 1. fix h_size validation v2 2. quota (un)reservation cleanups 3. Removal of duplicate includes i.e. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20240430034728.86811-1-jiapeng.chong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ The remaining patchsets from Christoph i.e. 1. optimize COW end I/O remapping v2 2. optimize local for and shortform directory handling 2. iext handling fixes and cleanup ... are either missing RVBs or need to address review comments. Darrick, I will update for-next sometime tomorrow evening my time. Can you please send me a pull request containing fs-verity patchset based on tomorrow's updated for-next branch by end of Friday? This will be last patchset I will be applying for 6.10 merge window since I would like to test linux-next during next week. -- Chandan
