On Wed, May 01, 2024 at 07:43:18AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > xfs_iext_count_extend() seems like a much better name - it tells the > reader what the code is actually doing (i.e. we may have to extend > the iext count before performing this operation) and it makes it > obvious when it is done out of place.... Sure, I can change the name. Btw, it would be nice to trim your reply a bit more, I had to scroll down a few pages of quotes text yo get here.
