Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs_repair: make duration take time_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:34:24PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ progress_rpt_thread (void *p)
>  	_("\t- %02d:%02d:%02d: Phase %d: %" PRIu64 "%% done - estimated remaining time %s\n"),
>  				tmp->tm_hour, tmp->tm_min, tmp->tm_sec,
>  				current_phase, percent,
> -				duration((int) ((*msgp->total - sum) * (elapsed)/sum), msgbuf));
> +				duration((time_t) ((*msgp->total - sum) * (elapsed)/sum), msgbuf));

What is the point of the time_t cast the gets applied to the
final calculated expression?  Even if time_t is wieder than what
it was, it would only extent it after we've overlflow the original
type.  The whole thing also just is formatted and filled with useles
braces to make it look really odd.  Something like:

				current_phase, percent,
				duration((*msgp->total - sum) * elapsed / sum,
					msgbuf));

would be way more readable.




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux