Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs_fsr: convert fsrallfs to use time_t instead of int

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 02:34:27PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> Convert howlong argument to a time_t as it's truncated to int, but in
> practice this is not an issue as duration will never be this big.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fsr/xfs_fsr.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fsr/xfs_fsr.c b/fsr/xfs_fsr.c
> index 3077d8f4ef46..07f3c8e23deb 100644
> --- a/fsr/xfs_fsr.c
> +++ b/fsr/xfs_fsr.c
> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ static int  packfile(char *fname, char *tname, int fd,
>  static void fsrdir(char *dirname);
>  static int  fsrfs(char *mntdir, xfs_ino_t ino, int targetrange);
>  static void initallfs(char *mtab);
> -static void fsrallfs(char *mtab, int howlong, char *leftofffile);
> +static void fsrallfs(char *mtab, time_t howlong, char *leftofffile);
>  static void fsrall_cleanup(int timeout);
>  static int  getnextents(int);
>  int xfsrtextsize(int fd);
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ initallfs(char *mtab)
>  }
>  
>  static void
> -fsrallfs(char *mtab, int howlong, char *leftofffile)
> +fsrallfs(char *mtab, time_t howlong, char *leftofffile)

Do you have to convert the printf format specifier too?

Also what happens if there's a parsing error and atoi() fails?  Right
now it looks like -t garbage gets you a zero run-time instead of a cli
parsing complaint?

--D

>  {
>  	int fd;
>  	int error;
> -- 
> 2.42.0
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux