On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 03:00:43AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 04:59:39PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 10:55:54PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > > > this series ensures tests pass on kernels without v5 support. As a side > > > > effect it also removes support for historic kernels and xfsprogs without > > > > any v5 support, and without mkfs input validation. > > > > > > Thanks for doing this! I'm wondering if fstests should do this "removing" > > > earlier than xfs? Hope to hear more opinions from xfs list and other fstests > > > users (especially from some LTS distro) :) > > > > What is being removed is support for kernels and xfsprogs that do not > > support v5 file systems at all, not testing on v4 file system for the > > test device and the large majority of tests using the scratch device > > without specifying an explicit version. > > Sure, I think most of systems testing doesn't need this, except some old > LTS distros. > > > > > The exception from the above are two sub-cases for v4 that are removed in > > the this series - if we really care about them I could move them into > > separate tests, but I doubt it's worth it. > > Let me check and test this patchset more, before acking it. And give some > time to get more review. Thanks for this patchset! My testing done on some old and new distro/kernels with v4 and v5 xfs. It looks good, doesn't bring in more issues. So I'd like to have this change. But as the review points from XFS list, looks like the patch 4/6 is better to not be merged, and the patch 6/6 need further changes? So I'll look forward the V2, to take more actions. Thanks, Zorro > > Thanks, > Zorro > > >
