On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 09:45:51AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Apart from those small complexities that are resolved by the end of > the patchset, the conversion and enhancement is relatively straight > forward. It passes fstests on both 512 and 4096 byte sector size > storage (512 byte sectors exercise the XBF_KMEM path which has > non-zero bp->b_offset values) and doesn't appear to cause any > problems with large 64kB directory buffers on 4kB page machines. Just curious, do you have any benchmark numbers to see if this actually improves performance?
