Re: [PATCH 0/6] block atomic writes for XFS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/02/2024 07:14, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 02:26:39PM +0000, John Garry wrote:
This series expands atomic write support to filesystems, specifically
XFS. Since XFS rtvol supports extent alignment already, support will
initially be added there. When XFS forcealign feature is merged, then we
can similarly support atomic writes for a non-rtvol filesystem.

Hi John,

Along with rtvol check, we can also have a simple check to see if the
FS blocksize itself is big enough to satisfy the atomic requirements.
For eg on machines with 64K page, we can have say 16k or 64k block sizes
which should be able to provide required allocation behavior for atomic
writes. In such cases we don't need rtvol.

I suppose we could do, but I would rather just concentrate on rtvol support initially, and there we do report atomic write unit min = FS block size (even if rt extsize is unset).

In addition, I plan to initially just support atomic write unit min = FS block size (for both rtvol and !rtvol).

Thanks,
John




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux