Re: [PATCH 08/10] xfs/503: split copy and metadump into two tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 05:36:17AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +++ b/tests/xfs/1876
> 
> What's it with these weird high test numbers?

Two reasons: I don't have to renumber all my new tests (and update the
spreadsheet I use to track upstreaming status) every time I rebase with
upstream; and the maintainer can git-am the patch as-is, without needing
to hand-edit the patches.

(Hmmm maybe fstests needs a git hook to detect a new test and
automatically renumber it.)

--D

> 
> Otherwise looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux