Re: [PATCH 0/2] fstest changes for LBS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 12:17:49PM +0100, Pankaj Raghav (Samsung) wrote:
> From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Some tests need to be adapted to for LBS[1] based on the filesystem
> blocksize. These are generic changes where it uses the filesystem
> blocksize instead of assuming it.
> 
> There are some more generic test cases that are failing due to logdev
> size requirement that changes with filesystem blocksize. I will address
> them in a separate series.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230915183848.1018717-1-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> 
> Pankaj Raghav (2):
>   xfs/558: scale blk IO size based on the filesystem blksz
>   xfs/161: adapt the test case for LBS filesystem

Do either of these fail and require fixing for a 64k page size
system running 64kB block size?

i.e. are these actual 64kB block size issues, or just issues with
the LBS patchset?

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux