On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 06:33:10PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > The only caller already performs the exact same check. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Makes sense now, Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> --D > --- > libxfs/topology.c | 9 --------- > 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libxfs/topology.c b/libxfs/topology.c > index 8ae5f7483..3a659c262 100644 > --- a/libxfs/topology.c > +++ b/libxfs/topology.c > @@ -181,15 +181,6 @@ blkid_get_topology( > { > blkid_topology tp; > blkid_probe pr; > - struct stat statbuf; > - > - /* can't get topology info from a file */ > - if (!stat(device, &statbuf) && S_ISREG(statbuf.st_mode)) { > - fprintf(stderr, > - _("%s: Warning: trying to probe topology of a file %s!\n"), > - progname, device); > - return; > - } > > pr = blkid_new_probe_from_filename(device); > if (!pr) > -- > 2.39.2 > >