On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 09:08:48 PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 08:36:19PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 06:17:34PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: >> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > We're only allocating from the realtime device if the inode is marked >> > for realtime and we're /not/ allocating into the attr fork. >> >> Hmm, interesting how this survived all my rtalloc tests. How did you >> find this? > > I actually found it while reabasing the rt reflink patchset atop > for-next, because you unified the bmap allocator accounting functions > instead of copy-pasting them like I did. Then I tried generic/476 and > it blew up the first time it encountered a reflink file. > >> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> > > Thanks! Chandan, can we get this merged? I have picked up the patch and will update for-next soon. I will send the second pull request for v6.8-rc1 on coming Monday if everything goes well. -- Chandan
