Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: iscan batching should handle unallocated inodes too

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: iscan batching should handle unallocated inodes too
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 03:40:24 -0800
Cc: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <170404826619.1747630.14010547497155037331.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs>
References: <170404826492.1747630.1053076578437373265.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs> <170404826619.1747630.14010547497155037331.stgit@frogsfrogsfrogs>

Any reason to not just fold this into the previous patch?

Otherwise looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: iscan batching should handle unallocated inodes too
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

References:
- [PATCHSET v29.0 01/28] xfs: live inode scans for online fsck
  - From: Darrick J. Wong
- [PATCH 7/7] xfs: iscan batching should handle unallocated inodes too
  - From: Darrick J. Wong

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 6/7] xfs: cache a bunch of inodes for repair scans
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/5] common/xfs: Do not append -a and -o options to metadump
Previous by thread: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: iscan batching should handle unallocated inodes too
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 7/7] xfs: iscan batching should handle unallocated inodes too
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Trails] [Linux Kernel] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux