Re: [PATCH 12/22] xfs: invert a check in xfs_rtallocate_extent_block

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 05:57:28AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Doing a break in the else side of a conditional is rather silly.  Invert
> the check, break ASAP and unindent the other leg.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

--D

> ---
>  fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> index fbc60658ef24bf..924665b66210ed 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
> @@ -283,12 +283,11 @@ xfs_rtallocate_extent_block(
>  		/*
>  		 * If not done yet, find the start of the next free space.
>  		 */
> -		if (next < end) {
> -			error = xfs_rtfind_forw(args, next, end, &i);
> -			if (error)
> -				return error;
> -		} else
> +		if (next >= end)
>  			break;
> +		error = xfs_rtfind_forw(args, next, end, &i);
> +		if (error)
> +			return error;
>  	}
>  	/*
>  	 * Searched the whole thing & didn't find a maxlen free extent.
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux