[PATCH v3 2/4] io: Assert we have a sensible off_t

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Suggested by Darrick during review of the first LFSization patch. Assert
we have an off_t capable of handling >=4GiB as a failsafe against the macros
not doing the right thing.

This is not the first time we've been on this adventure in XFS:
* 5c0599b721d1d232d2e400f357abdf2736f24a97 ('Fix building xfsprogs on 32-bit platforms')
* 65b4f302b7a1ddc14684ffbf8690227a67362586 ('platform: remove use of off64_t')
* 7fda99a0c2970f7da2661118b438e64dec1751b4 ('xfs.h: require transparent LFS for all users')
* ebe750ed747cbc59a5675193cdcbc3459ebda107 ('configure: error out when LFS does not work')
* 69268aaec5fb39ad71674336c0f6f75ca9f57999 ('configure: use AC_SYS_LARGEFILE')

Cc: Felix Janda <felix.janda@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 io/init.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/io/init.c b/io/init.c
index 104cd2c1..2fb598ac 100644
--- a/io/init.c
+++ b/io/init.c
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ init_cvtnum(
 static void
 init_commands(void)
 {
+	/* We're only interested in supporting an off_t which can handle >=4GiB. */
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(off_t) < 8);
+
 	attr_init();
 	bmap_init();
 	bulkstat_init();
-- 
2.43.0





[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux