There are currently multiple levels of fall back if an RT allocation
can not be satisfied:
1) xfs_rtallocate_extent extents the minlen and reduces the maxlen due
to the extent size hint. If that can't be done, it return -ENOSPC
and let's xfs_bmap_rtalloc retry, which then not only drops the
extent size hint based alignment, but also the minlen adjustment
2) if xfs_rtallocate_extent gets -ENOSPC from the underlying functions,
it only drops the extent size hint based alignment and retries
3) if that still does not succeed, xfs_rtallocate_extent drops the
extent size hint (which is a complex no-op at this point) and the
minlen using the same code as (1) above
4) if that still doesn't success and the caller wanted an allocation
near a blkno, drop that blkno hint.
The handling in 1 is rather inefficient as we could just drop the
alignment and continue, and 2/3 interact in really weird ways due to
the duplicate policy.
Move aligning the min and maxlen out of xfs_rtallocate_extent and into
a helper called directly by xfs_bmap_rtalloc. This allows just
continuing with the allocation if we have to drop the alignment instead
of going through the retry loop and also dropping the perfectly the
minlen adjustment that didn't cause the problem, and then just use
a single retry that drops both the minlen and alignment requirement
when we really are out of space, thus consolidating cases (2) and (3)
above.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
index 595740d18dc4c3..16255617629ef5 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
@@ -1088,21 +1088,6 @@ xfs_rtallocate_extent(
ASSERT(xfs_isilocked(args.mp->m_rbmip, XFS_ILOCK_EXCL));
ASSERT(minlen > 0 && minlen <= maxlen);
- /*
- * If prod is set then figure out what to do to minlen and maxlen.
- */
- if (prod > 1) {
- xfs_rtxlen_t i;
-
- if ((i = maxlen % prod))
- maxlen -= i;
- if ((i = minlen % prod))
- minlen += prod - i;
- if (maxlen < minlen)
- return -ENOSPC;
- }
-
-retry:
if (start == 0) {
error = xfs_rtallocate_extent_size(&args, minlen,
maxlen, len, prod, rtx);
@@ -1111,13 +1096,8 @@ xfs_rtallocate_extent(
maxlen, len, prod, rtx);
}
xfs_rtbuf_cache_relse(&args);
- if (error) {
- if (error == -ENOSPC && prod > 1) {
- prod = 1;
- goto retry;
- }
+ if (error)
return error;
- }
/*
* If it worked, update the superblock.
@@ -1348,6 +1328,35 @@ xfs_rtpick_extent(
return 0;
}
+static void
+xfs_rtalloc_align_minmax(
+ xfs_rtxlen_t *raminlen,
+ xfs_rtxlen_t *ramaxlen,
+ xfs_rtxlen_t *prod)
+{
+ xfs_rtxlen_t newmaxlen = *ramaxlen;
+ xfs_rtxlen_t newminlen = *raminlen;
+ xfs_rtxlen_t slack;
+
+ slack = newmaxlen % *prod;
+ if (slack)
+ newmaxlen -= slack;
+ slack = newminlen % *prod;
+ if (slack)
+ newminlen += *prod - slack;
+
+ /*
+ * If adjusting for extent size hint alignment produces an invalid
+ * min/max len combination, go ahead without it.
+ */
+ if (newmaxlen < newminlen) {
+ *prod = 1;
+ return;
+ }
+ *ramaxlen = newmaxlen;
+ *raminlen = newminlen;
+}
+
int
xfs_bmap_rtalloc(
struct xfs_bmalloca *ap)
@@ -1430,10 +1439,13 @@ xfs_bmap_rtalloc(
* perfectly aligned, otherwise it will just get us in trouble.
*/
div_u64_rem(ap->offset, align, &mod);
- if (mod || ap->length % align)
+ if (mod || ap->length % align) {
prod = 1;
- else
+ } else {
prod = xfs_extlen_to_rtxlen(mp, align);
+ if (prod > 1)
+ xfs_rtalloc_align_minmax(&raminlen, &ralen, &prod);
+ }
error = xfs_rtallocate_extent(ap->tp, start, raminlen, ralen, &ralen,
ap->wasdel, prod, &rtx);
--
2.39.2
