minlen is the lower bound on the extent length that the caller can
accept, and maxlen is at this point the maximal available length.
This means a minlen extent is perfectly fine to use, so do it. This
matches the equivalent logic in xfs_rtallocate_extent_exact that also
accepts a minlen sized extent.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
index 8feb58c6241ce4..fe98a96a26484f 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ xfs_rtallocate_extent_block(
/*
* Searched the whole thing & didn't find a maxlen free extent.
*/
- if (minlen < maxlen && besti != -1) {
+ if (minlen <= maxlen && besti != -1) {
xfs_rtxlen_t p; /* amount to trim length by */
/*
--
2.39.2
