On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 01:08:58PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > So I think we can grab the inode in the same transaction as the inode > core repairs. Nobody else should even be able to see that inode, so it > should be safe to grab i_rwsem before committing the transaction. Even > if I have to use trylock in a loop to make lockdep happy. Hmm, I though more of an inode flag that makes access to the inode outside of the scrubbe return -EIO. I can also warm up to the idea of having all inodes that are broken in some way in lost+found..
