On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:21:55PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 10:05:49PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 03:30:09PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote: > > > LOL so I just tried a 64k rt volume with a 1M rextsize and mkfs crashed. > > > I guess I'll go sort out what's going on there... > > > > I think we should just reject rt device size < rtextsize configs in > > the kernel and all tools. > > "But that could break old weirdass customer filesystems." > > The design of rtgroups prohibits that, so we're ok going forward. Well, as you just said it hasn't mounted for a long time, and really this is a corner case that just doesn't make any sense. I'd really prefer to cleanly reject it, and if someone really complains with a good reason we can revisit the decisions. But I strongly doubt it's ever going to happen.
