On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 09:53:38PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > @@ -480,7 +500,7 @@ xfs_btree_bload_node( > > > > ASSERT(!xfs_btree_ptr_is_null(cur, child_ptr)); > > > > - ret = xfs_btree_get_buf_block(cur, child_ptr, &child_block, > > + ret = xfs_btree_read_buf_block(cur, child_ptr, 0, &child_block, > > &child_bp); > > How is this (and making xfs_btree_read_buf_block outside of xfs_buf.c) > related to the dirty limit? Oh! Looking through my notes, I wanted the /new/ btree block buffers have the same lru reference count the old ones did. I probably should have exported xfs_btree_set_refs instead of reading whatever is on disk into a buffer, only to blow away the contents anyway. --D
