Re: [RFC 06/23] mm: call xas_set_order() in replace_page_cache_folio()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 08:38:31PM +0200, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Call xas_set_order() in replace_page_cache_folio() for non hugetlb
> pages.

This function definitely should work without this patch.  What goes wrong?

> Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  mm/filemap.c | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 4dee24b5b61c..33de71bfa953 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -815,12 +815,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(file_write_and_wait_range);
>  void replace_page_cache_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
>  {
>  	struct address_space *mapping = old->mapping;
> +	unsigned int min_order = mapping_min_folio_order(mapping);
>  	void (*free_folio)(struct folio *) = mapping->a_ops->free_folio;
>  	pgoff_t offset = old->index;
>  	XA_STATE(xas, &mapping->i_pages, offset);
>  
>  	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(old), old);
>  	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_locked(new), new);
> +	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_order(new) != folio_order(old), new);
>  	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(new->mapping, new);
>  
>  	folio_get(new);
> @@ -829,6 +831,11 @@ void replace_page_cache_folio(struct folio *old, struct folio *new)
>  
>  	mem_cgroup_migrate(old, new);
>  
> +	if (!folio_test_hugetlb(new)) {
> +		VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(folio_order(new) < min_order, new);
> +		xas_set_order(&xas, offset, folio_order(new));
> +	}
> +
>  	xas_lock_irq(&xas);
>  	xas_store(&xas, new);
>  
> -- 
> 2.40.1
> 



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux