Re: [PATCH v7 08/13] fs: drop the timespec64 argument from update_time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes. It's in Christian's vfs.ctime branch:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git/log/?h=vfs.ctime

On Wed, 2023-08-09 at 14:38 -0400, Mike Marshall wrote:
> I've been following this patch on fsdevel... is there a
> remote I could fetch with a branch that has this in it?
> 
> -Mike
> 
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 8:32 AM Christian Brauner <brauner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, Aug 07, 2023 at 03:38:39PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > > Now that all of the update_time operations are prepared for it, we can
> > > drop the timespec64 argument from the update_time operation. Do that and
> > > remove it from some associated functions like inode_update_time and
> > > inode_needs_update_time.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/bad_inode.c           |  3 +--
> > >  fs/btrfs/inode.c         |  3 +--
> > >  fs/btrfs/volumes.c       |  4 +---
> > >  fs/fat/fat.h             |  3 +--
> > >  fs/fat/misc.c            |  2 +-
> > >  fs/gfs2/inode.c          |  3 +--
> > >  fs/inode.c               | 30 +++++++++++++-----------------
> > >  fs/overlayfs/inode.c     |  2 +-
> > >  fs/overlayfs/overlayfs.h |  2 +-
> > >  fs/ubifs/file.c          |  3 +--
> > >  fs/ubifs/ubifs.h         |  2 +-
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_iops.c        |  1 -
> > >  include/linux/fs.h       |  4 ++--
> > 
> > This was missing the conversion of fs/orangefs orangefs_update_time()
> > causing the build to fail. So at some point kbuild will yell here.
> > Fwiw, I've fixed that up in-tree.

Cheers,
-- 
Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux