Re: [PATCH v7 04/13] btrfs: have it use inode_update_timestamps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon 07-08-23 15:38:35, Jeff Layton wrote:
> In later patches, we're going to drop the "now" argument from the
> update_time operation. Have btrfs_update_time use the new
> inode_update_timestamps helper to fetch a new timestamp and update it
> properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>

Nice cleanup! Feel free to add:

Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/btrfs/inode.c | 9 +--------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 29a20f828dda..d52e7d64570a 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -6068,14 +6068,7 @@ static int btrfs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec64 *now,
>  	if (btrfs_root_readonly(root))
>  		return -EROFS;
>  
> -	if (flags & S_VERSION)
> -		dirty |= inode_maybe_inc_iversion(inode, dirty);
> -	if (flags & S_CTIME)
> -		inode_set_ctime_to_ts(inode, *now);
> -	if (flags & S_MTIME)
> -		inode->i_mtime = *now;
> -	if (flags & S_ATIME)
> -		inode->i_atime = *now;
> +	dirty = inode_update_timestamps(inode, flags);
>  	return dirty ? btrfs_dirty_inode(BTRFS_I(inode)) : 0;
>  }
>  
> 
> -- 
> 2.41.0
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux