Hi! > I can't reproduce this on current mainline. Is this a robust failure > or flapping test? Especiall as the FAIL conditions look rather > unrelated. Actually the test is spot on, the difference is that previously the error was returned form the iomap_file_buffered_write() only if we failed with the first buffer from the iov, now we always return the error and we do not advance the offset. The change that broke it: diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c index 063133ec77f4..550525a525c4 100644 --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c @@ -864,16 +864,19 @@ iomap_file_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i, .len = iov_iter_count(i), .flags = IOMAP_WRITE, }; - int ret; + ssize_t ret; if (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_NOWAIT) iter.flags |= IOMAP_NOWAIT; while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0) iter.processed = iomap_write_iter(&iter, i); - if (iter.pos == iocb->ki_pos) + + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) return ret; - return iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos; + ret = iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos; + iocb->ki_pos += ret; + return ret; } I suppose that we shoudl fix is with something as: diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c index adb92cdb24b0..bfb39f7bc303 100644 --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c @@ -872,11 +872,12 @@ iomap_file_buffered_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *i, while ((ret = iomap_iter(&iter, ops)) > 0) iter.processed = iomap_write_iter(&iter, i); + iocb->ki_pos += iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos; + if (unlikely(ret < 0)) return ret; - ret = iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos; - iocb->ki_pos += ret; - return ret; + + return iter.pos - iocb->ki_pos; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_file_buffered_write); -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@xxxxxxx