Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs/155: improve logging in this test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 03:29:19PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> If this test fails after a certain number of writes, we should state
> the exact number of writes so that we can coordinate with 155.full.
> Instead, we state the pre-randomization number, which isn't all that
> helpful.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Makes sense.
Reviewed-by: Bill O'Donnell <bodonnel@xxxxxxxxxx>


> ---
>  tests/xfs/155 |    3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tests/xfs/155 b/tests/xfs/155
> index 25cc84069c..302607b510 100755
> --- a/tests/xfs/155
> +++ b/tests/xfs/155
> @@ -63,11 +63,12 @@ done
>  
>  # If NEEDSREPAIR is still set on the filesystem, ensure that a full run
>  # cleans everything up.
> +echo "Checking filesystem one last time after $allowed_writes writes." >> $seqres.full
>  if _check_scratch_xfs_features NEEDSREPAIR &> /dev/null; then
>  	echo "Clearing NEEDSREPAIR" >> $seqres.full
>  	_scratch_xfs_repair 2>> $seqres.full
>  	_check_scratch_xfs_features NEEDSREPAIR > /dev/null && \
> -		echo "Repair failed to clear NEEDSREPAIR on the $nr_writes writes test"
> +		echo "Repair failed to clear NEEDSREPAIR on the $allowed_writes writes test"
>  fi
>  
>  # success, all done
> 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux