Am Mo., 5. Juni 2023 um 23:05 Uhr schrieb Ritesh Harjani
<ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 12:55 PM Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> We would eventually use iomap_iop_** function naming by the rest of the
> >> buffered-io iomap code. This patch update function arguments and naming
> >> from iomap_set_range_uptodate() -> iomap_iop_set_range_uptodate().
> >> iop_set_range_uptodate() then becomes an accessor function used by
> >> iomap_iop_** functions.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> >> index 6fffda355c45..136f57ccd0be 100644
> >> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> >> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> >> @@ -24,14 +24,14 @@
> >> #define IOEND_BATCH_SIZE 4096
> >>
> >> /*
> >> - * Structure allocated for each folio when block size < folio size
> >> - * to track sub-folio uptodate status and I/O completions.
> >> + * Structure allocated for each folio to track per-block uptodate state
> >> + * and I/O completions.
> >> */
> >> struct iomap_page {
> >> atomic_t read_bytes_pending;
> >> atomic_t write_bytes_pending;
> >> - spinlock_t uptodate_lock;
> >> - unsigned long uptodate[];
> >> + spinlock_t state_lock;
> >> + unsigned long state[];
> >> };
> >>
> >> static inline struct iomap_page *to_iomap_page(struct folio *folio)
> >> @@ -43,6 +43,48 @@ static inline struct iomap_page *to_iomap_page(struct folio *folio)
> >>
> >> static struct bio_set iomap_ioend_bioset;
> >>
> >> +static bool iop_test_full_uptodate(struct folio *folio)
> >> +{
> >> + struct iomap_page *iop = to_iomap_page(folio);
> >> + struct inode *inode = folio->mapping->host;
> >> +
> >> + return bitmap_full(iop->state, i_blocks_per_folio(inode, folio));
> >> +}
> >
> > Can this be called iop_test_fully_uptodate(), please?
> >
>
> IMHO, iop_test_full_uptodate() looks fine. It goes similar to
> bitmap_full() function.
Nah, it really isn't fine, it's "the bitmap is full" vs. "the iop is
fully uptodate"; you can't say "the iop is full uptodate".
Thanks,
Andreas
