On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:58:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Remove locking of moved directory in ext4_rename2(). We will take care
> of it in VFS instead. This effectively reverts commit 0813299c586b
> ("ext4: Fix possible corruption when moving a directory") and followup
> fixes.
Remind me --- commit 0813299c586b is not actually causing any
problems; it's just not fully effective at solving the problem. Is
that correct?
In other words, is there a rush in trying to get this revert to Linus
during this cycle as a regression fix?
I think the answer is no, and we can just let this full patch series
go in via the vfs branch during the next merge window, but I just
wanted to make sure.
Thanks!
- Ted
