On 5/25/23 10:55, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > Bottom line, having various companies run their own private instances > of syzkaller is much less useful for the upstream community. Yes, totally agree. > If Intel feels that it's useful to run their own instance, maybe > there's some way you can work with Google syzkaller team so you don't > have to do that? I actually don't know why or when Intel started doing this. 0day in general runs on a pretty diverse set of systems and I suspect this was an attempt to leverage that. Philip, do you know the history here? Pengfei, is there a list somewhere of the things that you think are missing from Google's syzkaller instance? If not, could you make one, please?
