[PATCH 16/17] xfs: remove pointless unlocked assertion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>

Remove this assertion about the inode not having an attr fork from
xfs_bmap_add_attrfork because the function handles that case just fine.
Weirder still, the function actually /requires/ the caller not to hold
the ILOCK, which means that its accesses are not stabilized.

Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)


diff --git a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
index 42932fb55cf3..1570b6210e9e 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_bmap.c
@@ -1017,8 +1017,6 @@ xfs_bmap_add_attrfork(
 	int			logflags;	/* logging flags */
 	int			error;		/* error return value */
 
-	ASSERT(xfs_inode_has_attr_fork(ip) == 0);
-
 	mp = ip->i_mount;
 	ASSERT(!XFS_NOT_DQATTACHED(mp, ip));
 




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux