From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Commit 6bc6c99a944c was a well-intentioned effort to initiate
consolidation of adjacent bmbt mapping records by setting the PREEN
flag. Consolidation can only happen if the length of the combined
record doesn't overflow the 21-bit blockcount field of the bmbt
recordset. Unfortunately, the length test is inverted, leading to it
triggering on data forks like these:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE AG AG-OFFSET TOTAL
0: [0..16777207]: 76110848..92888055 0 (76110848..92888055) 16777208
1: [16777208..20639743]: 92888056..96750591 0 (92888056..96750591) 3862536
Note that record 0 has a length of 16777208 512b blocks. This
corresponds to 2097151 4k fsblocks, which is the maximum. Hence the two
records cannot be merged.
However, the logic is still wrong even if we change the in-loop
comparison, because the scope of our examination isn't broad enough
inside the loop to detect mappings like this:
0: [0..9]: 76110838..76110847 0 (76110838..76110847) 10
1: [10..16777217]: 76110848..92888055 0 (76110848..92888055) 16777208
2: [16777218..20639753]: 92888056..96750591 0 (92888056..96750591) 3862536
These three records could be merged into two, but one cannot determine
this purely from looking at records 0-1 or 1-2 in isolation.
Hoist the mergability detection outside the loop, and base its decision
making on whether or not a merged mapping could be expressed in fewer
bmbt records. While we're at it, fix the incorrect return type of the
iter function.
Fixes: 6bc6c99a944c ("xfs: alert the user about data/attr fork mappings that could be merged")
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/xfs/scrub/bmap.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/scrub/bmap.c b/fs/xfs/scrub/bmap.c
index 69bc89d0fc68..5bf4326e9783 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/scrub/bmap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/scrub/bmap.c
@@ -769,14 +769,14 @@ xchk_are_bmaps_contiguous(
* mapping or false if there are no more mappings. Caller must ensure that
* @info.icur is zeroed before the first call.
*/
-static int
+static bool
xchk_bmap_iext_iter(
struct xchk_bmap_info *info,
struct xfs_bmbt_irec *irec)
{
struct xfs_bmbt_irec got;
struct xfs_ifork *ifp;
- xfs_filblks_t prev_len;
+ unsigned int nr = 0;
ifp = xfs_ifork_ptr(info->sc->ip, info->whichfork);
@@ -790,12 +790,12 @@ xchk_bmap_iext_iter(
irec->br_startoff);
return false;
}
+ nr++;
/*
* Iterate subsequent iextent records and merge them with the one
* that we just read, if possible.
*/
- prev_len = irec->br_blockcount;
while (xfs_iext_peek_next_extent(ifp, &info->icur, &got)) {
if (!xchk_are_bmaps_contiguous(irec, &got))
break;
@@ -805,20 +805,21 @@ xchk_bmap_iext_iter(
got.br_startoff);
return false;
}
-
- /*
- * Notify the user of mergeable records in the data or attr
- * forks. CoW forks only exist in memory so we ignore them.
- */
- if (info->whichfork != XFS_COW_FORK &&
- prev_len + got.br_blockcount > BMBT_BLOCKCOUNT_MASK)
- xchk_ino_set_preen(info->sc, info->sc->ip->i_ino);
+ nr++;
irec->br_blockcount += got.br_blockcount;
- prev_len = got.br_blockcount;
xfs_iext_next(ifp, &info->icur);
}
+ /*
+ * If the merged mapping could be expressed with fewer bmbt records
+ * than we actually found, notify the user that this fork could be
+ * optimized. CoW forks only exist in memory so we ignore them.
+ */
+ if (nr > 1 && info->whichfork != XFS_COW_FORK &&
+ howmany_64(irec->br_blockcount, XFS_MAX_BMBT_EXTLEN) < nr)
+ xchk_ino_set_preen(info->sc, info->sc->ip->i_ino);
+
return true;
}
