[RFCv5 4/5] iomap: Allocate iop in ->write_begin() early

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Earlier when the folio is uptodate, we only allocate iop at writeback
time (in iomap_writepage_map()). This is ok until now, but when we are
going to add support for per-block dirty state bitmap in iop, this
could cause some performance degradation. The reason is that if we don't
allocate iop during ->write_begin(), then we will never mark the
necessary dirty bits in ->write_end() call. And we will have to mark all
the bits as dirty at the writeback time, that could cause the same write
amplification and performance problems as it is now.

However, for all the writes with (pos, len) which completely overlaps
the given folio, there is no need to allocate an iop during
->write_begin(). So skip those cases.

Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index 5103b644e115..25f20f269214 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -599,15 +599,25 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos,
 	size_t from = offset_in_folio(folio, pos), to = from + len;
 	size_t poff, plen;
 
-	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
+	/*
+	 * If the write completely overlaps the current folio, then
+	 * entire folio will be dirtied so there is no need for
+	 * per-block state tracking structures to be attached to this folio.
+	 */
+	if (pos <= folio_pos(folio) &&
+	    pos + len >= folio_pos(folio) + folio_size(folio))
 		return 0;
-	folio_clear_error(folio);
 
 	iop = iop_alloc(iter->inode, folio, iter->flags);
 
 	if ((iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT) && !iop && nr_blocks > 1)
 		return -EAGAIN;
 
+	if (folio_test_uptodate(folio))
+		return 0;
+	folio_clear_error(folio);
+
+
 	do {
 		iomap_adjust_read_range(iter->inode, folio, &block_start,
 				block_end - block_start, &poff, &plen);
-- 
2.39.2




[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux