Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fs: add infrastructure for multigrain inode i_m/ctime

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 01:45:19PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> Erm...it may be an unpopular opinion, but I find that more confusing
> than just ensuring that the s_time_gran > 1. I keep wondering if we
> might want to carve out other low-order bits too for some later purpose,
> at which point trying to check this using flags wouldn't work right. I
> think I might just stick with what I have here, at least for now.

But what if I set s_time_gran to 3 or 5?  You'd really want a warning
about that.



[Index of Archives]     [XFS Filesystem Development (older mail)]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]


  Powered by Linux